|
|
| 第2,436行： |
第2,436行： |
| 你可以使用上面的表格来确定在寻找暗金时清除速度相当于一定数量的 MF 这对于确定特定角色来说清除速度或 MF 是否更好很有用. | | 你可以使用上面的表格来确定在寻找暗金时清除速度相当于一定数量的 MF 这对于确定特定角色来说清除速度或 MF 是否更好很有用. |
|
| |
|
| : <code>difference = (new-effective-MF + 100) / (old-effective-MF + 100) * 100% - 100%</code> | | : <code>差异 = (新的-有效-MF + 100) / (旧的-有效-MF + 100) * 100% - 100%</code> |
|
| |
|
| If you have 0 MF and want to determine how many more uniques you'll find with more MF, you can lookup the amount directly in the table. Suppose you want to compare 0 MF vs 130 MF - you'll see 130 MF is equal to 85 effective MF for uniques, so you'll find 85% more uniques on average. In other words, you'll find 85% more than the standard amount (100%) of uniques, or 185% of the standard amount. A character with 130 MF (85% effective MF) would find the same amount of uniques as a character with 0 MF who was clearing 85% faster.
| | 如果你的 MF 为 0 并且想要确定使用多少的 MF 可以找到暗金的几率, 则可以直接在表中查找该直线数值. 假设你想比较 0 MF vs 130 MF - 你会发现 130 MF 等于 85 暗金的有效 MF, 所以你会发现平均多 85% 的暗金数值. 换句话说, 你将发现暗金的数值比标准量 (100%) 多 85%，或者说比标准量多 185%. 拥有 130 MF (85% 有效 MF) 的角色所获得的暗金可能性数值与拥有 0 MF 的角色所获得的暗金可能性数值相同而后者的清除速度要快 85%. |
|
| |
|
| When comparing MF values and one of them is 0 MF, part of the comparison is simplified since all MF values are equal to eachother at that point: 0 MF is the same as 0 effective MF. In the previous comparison of 0 MF vs 130 MF, 100% of the standard amount is compared against 185% of the standard amount, so the new value is 1.85 (185/100) times greater, or 185% (1.85*100%) of the standard amount, or 85% (185%-100%) more.
| | 当比较 MF 值而其中一个为 0 MF 时, 由于所有 MF 值在该点相等因此部分比较简化了: 0 MF 等于 0 有效 MF. 在之前的 0 MF vs 130 MF 的比较中, 100% 的标准量与 185% 的标准量相比, 所以新的值是 1.85 (185/100) 倍, 或 185% (1.85*100%) 的标准量, 或 85% (185%-100%) 的标准量. |
|
| |
|
| : (85+100) / (0+100) * 100% - 100% = 85% | | : (85+100) / (0+100) * 100% - 100% = 85% |
|
| |
|
| Suppose you have 130 MF (which is 85 effective MF for uniques) and are trying to decide whether a new item with an extra 50 MF would be worth it. From the table, we can see 180 MF (130 + 50) would be 104 effective MF for uniques. Plugging in the effective MF amounts:
| | 假设你有 130 MF (对于暗金的有效 MF 是 85) 并试图决定一个额外 50 MF 的新物品是否值得. 从表中, 我们可以看到 180 MF (130 + 50) 将是 104 有效 MF 的暗金. 代入有效 MF 数值量: |
|
| |
|
| : (104+100) / (85+100) * 100% - 100% = 10.3% | | : (104+100) / (85+100) * 100% - 100% = 10.3% |
|
| |
|
| That's an extra 10.3% unique items. If using the 50 MF item doesn't result in your clearspeed dropping by 10.3%, then you'll find more uniques with it than without it.
| | 这是额外的 10.3% 的暗金物品. 如果使用 50 MF 物品不会导致你的清除速度下降 10.3%, 那么你会发现有了它能找到更多暗金. |
|
| |
|
| Keep in mind that these comparisons only apply to items which can have different rarities and are thus affected by MF - they won't apply to other items such as runes. If those other items make up a large fraction of the value you find among items, the overall usefulness of the MF will drop by however large that fraction is. For example, if 1/3 of the value you find is within other items, then the above examples would be 1/3 less for the purposes of comparing MF and clearspeed: 56.7% instead of 85% and 6.8% instead of 10.3%.
| | 请记住这些比较只适用于具有不同稀有度的物品因此会受到 MF 的影响 - 它们不适用于其他物品如符文. 如果这些其他物品占你在物品中发现的价值的很大一部分, 那么无论这个比例有多大 MF 的总体有效性都会下降. 例如, 如果你找到的价值的 1/3 是在其他物品中那么上面的例子将减少 1/3, 以比较 MF 和清除速度: 56.7% 而不是 85% 和 6.8% 而不是 10.3%. |